Close

FINRA Lawyer Blog

Updated:

FEDERAL COURT EXPANDS THE DEFINITION OF “CUSTOMER” FOR PURPOSES OF COMPELLING FINRA ARBITRATION

In Next Financial Group, Inc. v. GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc., Case No. 3:19-cv-168 (USDC W.D. Pa.), the federal court was asked to define the term “customer” as it relates to FINRA’s Code of Arbitration Procedure.  The definition of that term carries significance because “customers” can compel a member…

Updated:

FINRA CHARGES AN FA FOR STRUCTURING CASH DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS

On March 11, 2020, FINRA charged an FA with structuring cash transactions in his personal bank account so as to evade reporting requirements.  This case is worth a read because it highlights FINRAs commitment to pursue AML and AML-like cases. Case in Point In Department of Enforcement v. David R.…

Updated:

FA CLAIMS THAT FINRA OBTAINED HIS SETTLEMENT BY FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT

This is a classic case of buyer’s remorse.  In the case at hand, FA Jeffrey Mohlman settled with FINRA by executing a letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (called an AWC) and, in so doing, agreed to a bar from the securities industry.  Apparently displeased with his decision, he filed…

Updated:

VIRGINIA BANS MANDATORY ARBITRATION IN ADVISORY AGREEMENTS

New Rule Virginia recently added Section F to 21 VAC5-80-200 (Dishonest or Unethical Practices), which provides:  “For purposes of this section, any mandatory arbitration provision in an advisory contract shall be prohibited.” Background On June 27, 2019, Virginia issued a proposal to amend certain regulations administered by the Virginia Division…

Updated:

FINRA BARS A SUPERVISOR FOR THE MISDEEDS OF ANOTHER

Courts call a lifetime bar “the securities industry equivalent of capital punishment.”  PAZ Sec. Inc. v. SEC, 494 F.3d 1059, 1065 (D.C. Cir. 2007).  It is a draconian measure which not only permanently removes you from the securities industry but also subjects you to “statutory disqualification” under Section 3(a)(39)(A) of…

Updated:

UBS DEFAMES AN FA BUT STILL WINS BIG

This blog post looks at an interesting FINRA arbitration award issued on January 7, 2020:  Daniel Paul Motherway v. UBS Financial Services, Inc., FINRA Arbitration No. 17-02799.  This case seems to prove the old adage:  a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.  Here we…

Updated:

FINRA Attacks Suitability By Challenging FAs Product Knowledge

On January 3, 2020, FINRA released an AWC for Robert James D’Andria, Case No. 2017056579502.  At first blush the AWC seems rather plain vanilla.  The FA recommended high-risk products, in this case leveraged and inverse exchange-traded notes and funds, to retail investors and FINRA deemed those recommendations to be unsuitable. …

Updated:

FINRA ARBITRATORS REFUSE TO PERMIT FAs TESTIMONY: BUT THEY DID HEAR FROM THE SUBSTITUTE TEACHER

FINRA published an interesting arbitration award on December 27, 2019.  In Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Gregory D. Clark (FINRA Case Number 18-04011), Raymond James claimed that Mr. Clark breached a settlement agreement related to the repayment of a promissory note.  Raymond James requested, and was awarded, compensatory damages…

Updated:

FINRA HITS AN FA FOR FAILING TO DISCLOSE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF AN ACCOUNT

On December 20, 2019, FINRA announced a settlement with John Carneglia.  According to the AWC, Carneglia violated FINRA Rule 3210 for failing to notify his member firm of a brokerage account and violated FINRA Rule 3270 for failing to timely disclose an outside business activity. Underlying Facts Carenglia was registered…

Updated:

FINRA DROPS THE STATUTORY DISQUALIFICATION HAMMER

On December 16, 2019, FINRA released the AWC in Matter No. 2018060843801 (In re Molteni) [click here to read the AWC].  At first blush, the AWC seems to concern a garden variety violation in which the FA failed to amend his Form U4 to disclose two federal tax liens.  This…

Contact Us